نویسنده

چکیده

در این تحقیق، حل تقریبی بردار سرعت لازم با قید بردار سرعت با فرض شتاب جاذبة خطی بین موقعیت فعلی و موقعیت نهایی ارائه شده‌است. در ادامه، حل تحلیلی ماتریس حساسیت بردار سرعت لازم نسبت به بردار موقعیت به‌دست می‌آید. حل‌های مذکور به ازای زمان نهایی از پیش‌تعیین حاصل شده‌است. آزاد بودن موقعیت نهایی در این مسئله، حل تحلیلی را نسبت به مسائل با قید بردار موقعیت نهایی، دشوارتر می‌کند. بنابراین، برای محاسبة بردار موقعیت نهایی از سه تقریب استفاده شده‌است. در نهایت، حل‌های به‌دست آمده با حل دقیق برای مدل زمین کروی مقایسه شده‌ است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Approximate Solution of Sensitivity Matrix with Final Velocity Constraint Using Linear Time-Varying Gravity Assumption

نویسنده [English]

  • S. H. Jalali Naini

چکیده [English]

In this research, an approximate solution of the required velocity with final velocity constraint is derived using linear gravity assumption along the path of current position to the final position vectors. Moreover, an approximate solution for sensitivity matrix of the required velocity with respect to the position vector is obtained. The presented solutions are given for a predetermined final time. In this case, for the free final position, the analytical solution is rather more difficult than its fixed final position counterpart. Therefore, three approaches are utilized for approximation of the final position vector. Finally, the obtained solutions are compared to exact numerical one for the spherical-Earth model.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • requrired velocity
  • sensitivity matrix
  • implicit guidance
  1. Pitman, G. R., Inertial Guidance, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1962.
  2. Battin, R. H., An Introduction to the Mathematics and Methods of Astrodynamics, Revised Edition, AIAA Education Series, USA, 1999.
  3. Martin, F. H., Closed-Loop Near-Optimum Steering for a Class of Space Missions, (B. Sc. Thesis), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1965.
  4. Zarchan, P., Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance, 4th, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, 2002.
  5. Siouris, G. M., Missile Guidance and Control Systems, Springer Verlag, NY, 2004.
  6. Battin, R. H., “Space Guidance Evolution- A Personal Narrative,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1982, pp. 97-110.
  7. Battin, R. H., “Lambert’s Problem Revisited,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1977, pp. 707-713.
  8. Battin, R. H., “An Elegant Lambert Algorithm,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 7, No. 6, 1984, pp. 662-670.
  9. Nelson, S. L., and Zarchan, P., “Alternative Approach to the Solution of Lambert’s Problem,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1992, pp. 1003-1009.
  10. Izzo, D., “Lambert’s Problem for Exponential Sinusoids,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 5, 2006, pp. 1242-1245.
  11. Zhang, G., Mortari, D., and Zhou, D., “Constrained Multiple-Revolution Lambert’s Problem,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1779-1786.
  12. Leeghim, H. and Jaroux, B. A., “Energy-Optimal Solution to the Lambert Problem,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2010, pp. 1008-1010.
  13. Bando, M. and Yamakawa, H., “New Lambert Algorithm Using the Hamiltonian-Jacobi-Bellman Equation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2010, pp. 1000-1008.
  14. Jalali-Naini, S. H., “An Implicit Guidance Formulation for Velocity Constraint,” The 9th Iranian Aerospace Society Conference, Tehran, Feb. 2010.
  15. Jalali-Naini, S. H., “Differential Equation of Sensitivity Matrix for Final Velocity Constraint,” Journal of Aerospace Science and Technology, Iranian Aerospace Society, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2009, pp. 55-61.