Authors

Abstract

In this study, a fault tolerant Attitude Determination System (ADS) has been designed which provides fault detection, isolation and tolerant abilities in this system. Suggested approach is based on derivation of all possible rotations between body and orbital frames and comparison of Euler angles provided by them. In this regard, significant changes in the variance of Euler angles set are considered as criteria for fault detection. Moreover, fault isolation and tolerant mechanisms are based on classification of rotation matrices which are not affected by faulty components. The above features present a quite analytical and computational approach which does not impose additional mass, power consumption and cost in the satellite. Also, designed diagnosis and fault correction algorithms are model-free basedmechanisms which always provide tolerated attitude angles for the attitude control subsystem. The mentioned abilities combined with the model based FDI mechanisms utilized in the attitude control system, provide an advanced decision support system capable of isolation of faults which have been simultaneously occurred in the satellite sensors and actuators. Finally, performance of the designed algorithm is approved by simulation results.

Keywords

  1. Venkateswaran, , Siva M. S. and Goel, P. S., “Analytical Redundancy Based Fault Detection of Gyroscopes in Spacecraft Applications”, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 50, No 9, 2002, pp. 535-545.
  2. Castet, J. F. and Saleh, J. H., “Satellite and Satellite Subsystems Reliability: Statistical Data Analysis and Modeling”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 94, Issue 11, 2009, pp. 1718-1728.
  3. Tehrani, E. S. and Khorasani, K., Fault Diagnosis of Nonlinear Systems Using a Hybrid Approach, Springer, New York, 2009.
  4. Hwang, I. and Kim, S., “A Survey of Fault Detection, Isolation and Reconfiguration Method”, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 18, No 3, 2010, pp. 636-653.
  5. Frank, P. M., “Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems Using Analytical and Knowledge-Based Redundancy-A Survey and Some New Results”, Journal of Automatica, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1990, pp. 459-474.
  6. Patton, R. J., “Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Aerospace Systems Using Analytical Redundancy”, Computing and Control Engineering Journal, Vol. 2, No.3, 1991, pp. 127-136.
  7. Venkatasubramanian, V., Rengaswamy, R. and Kavuri, S. N., “A Review of Process Fault Detection and Diagnosis Part I: Quantitative Model-Based Methods”, Journal of Computers & Chemical Engineering, Vol. 27, N0. 3, 2003, pp. 293-311.
  8. Venkatasubramanian, V., Rengaswamy, R. and Kavuri, S. N., “A Review of Process Fault Detection and Diagnosis Part II: Qualitative Models and Search Strategies”, Journal of Computers & Chemical Engineering, Vol. 27, 2003, pp. 313-326.
  9. Venkatasubramanian, V., Rengaswamy, R. and Kavuri, S. N., “A Review of Process Fault Detection and Diagnosis Part III: Process History Based Methods”, Journal of Computers & Chemical Engineering, Vol. 27, 327-346.
  10. Iserman, R., Fault Diagnosis Systems: An Introduction from Fault Detection to Fault Tolerance, Springer, Germany, 2006.
  11. Zhang, Y. and Jiang, J., “Bibliographical Review on Reconfigurable Fault Tolerant Control Systems”, Annual Reviews in Control, Vol. 32, 2008, pp. 229-252.
  12. Pirmoradi, F. N., Sassani, F. and Silva C. W. D., “Fault Detection and Diagnosis in a Spacecraft Attitude Determination System”, Journal of Acta Astronautica, Vol. 65, No. 5-6, 2009, pp. 710–72.
  13. Okatan, A., Hajyev C. and Hajiyeva, U., “Kalman Filter Innovation Sequence Based Fault Detection in Leo Satellite Attitude Determination and Control System”, 3rd International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies RAST '07, Istanbul, 2007, pp. 411–416.
  14. Xiong, K., Chan, C. W. and Zhang, H. Y., “Detection of Satellites Attitude Sensor Faults Using the UKF”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2007, pp. 480–491.
  15. Soken, H. E., Hajiyev, C., “Pico Satellite Attitude Estimation Via Robust Unscented Kalman Filter in the Presence of Measurement Faults”, ISA Transactions, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2010, pp. 249-256.
  16. Bae, J. and Kim, Y., “Attitude Estimation for Satellite Fault Tolerant System Using Federated Unscented Kalman Filter”, International Journal of Aeronautical & Space Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2010, 80-86.
  17. Li, J., Chan, C. W. and Zhang, H. Y., “Asymptotic Local Approach in Fault Detection Based on Predictive Filters,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 28, No. 6, 2005, pp. 1112-1122.
  18. Talebi, H. A. and Khorasani, K., “An Intelligent Sensor and Actuator Fault Detection and Isolation Scheme for Nonlinear Systems”, Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2007, pp. 2620-2625.
  19. Wu, Q. and Saif, M., “Robust Fault Diagnosis for Satellite Attitude Systems Using Neural State Space Models”, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V 2, 2005, pp. 1955 – 1960.
  20. He, R., Chen, X., Geng, Y. and Zhang, Y., “Integrated Fault Detection and Fault-Tolerant Based on Sliding Mode Observer”, 4th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, Harbin, China, 2009, pp. 3454 - 3457 .