Authors

Abstract

The international system proposed the liability convention 1972 for compensating damages occurred while utilizing space. However, certain key principles of liability such as some rules of conflict law and jurisdictions have been neglected there. This convention failed to provide a unified regime like that of established by the Warsaw system for air carrier liability against passengers and cargo. Because of this failure and due to the international nature of space activities, during the past two decades, states inclined toward bilateral and multilateral space agreements for determining liability and compensating probable damages. In this paper it is argued that international law system is capable of finding common points in the said agreements and taking a new step toward uniformity of international regulations of space liability by modifying the convention 1972

Keywords

  1. Cheng, , Studies in International Space Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997, p 330.
  2. Maniatis, D., “The Law Governing Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects: From State Responsibility to Private Liability,” Annual Air & Space Law, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1997, p 373.
  3. Kerrest, A., “Launching Spacecraft from the Sea and the Outer Treaty: The Sea Launch Project,” Proceeding 27th Colloquium, Outer Space 40, 1997, p. 264.
  4. Hurwitz, B., State Liability for Outer Space Activities, Martinus Nijhoff, 1992, p 39.
  5. See Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc., 362 S. 539.
  6. Kayser, V., Launching Space Objects, Issues of Liability and Future Prospects, Springer, 2001, p. 244.
  7. Change, B., “Article VI of the 1967 Space Treaty Revisited: International Responsibility, National Activities and the Appropriate State,” Journal of  Space Law, 26, No.1, 1998, p.7
  8. Christol, C. Q., The Modern International Law of Outer Space, Pergamon Press, 1982, pp 39-42
  9. Gimblett, R., Space Insurance into the Next Millennium, in: Outlook on Space Law Over the Next 30 years, Kluwer, 1997, p.163
  10. Lee, R. j., “The Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects and the Domestic Regulatory Responses to Its Implications,” Singapore Journal of International & Comparative Law, 4, No. 1, 2003, pp. 1-27.
  11. Lee, R. j., “Reconciling International Space Law with the Commercial Realities of the Twenty-first Century,” Singapore Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2003, pp 194 – 251.
  12. Christol, C. Q,. “International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects,” The American Journal of International Law, 74, No. 2, 1980, pp. 346-351.
  13. Koops-Jubitana, S. C., Commercial Launch Activities: Launch Contracts and Launch Insurance- Liability Aspects- (M Thesis) Leiden University, 2006, p. 10.
  14. Bulk-Buy of Launch Services See Available: [on line], http://womeninbusiness.about.com/od/ commercialleasingterms/g/turnkey.htm
  15. Bender, R., Lunching and Operating Satelates – Legal Issues, Kluwer, 1998.
  16. Available: [on line],arianespace.com/
  17. Available: [on line],cnes.fr/
  18. Available: [on line],com/
  19. Hermida, J. Norms Governing Launch Services by NASA and Commercial US Private Companies, (LL.D. Thesis), Catholic University of Cordoba, Doctorate of Laws Thesis 2000, p.126.
  20. Bostwick, P. D., “Liability of Aerospace Manufacturers: MacPherson V. Buick Sputters into the Space Age”, Journal Space Law, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1994, p. 80.
  21. Maniatis, D., “The Law Governing Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects: From State Responsibility to Private Liability, Annals of Air and Space Law, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1997, p. 373.
  22. Available: [on line], imf.org/