Authors

Abstract

Shape and size of sensitive volume are the most important parameters to model electronic devices for calculation of the SEU rate from space radiations. So far different models have been proposed for estimation of the sensitive volume. In this work, results of three models including RPP, Tetrahedral and Nested in calculation of sensitive volume have been compared with experimental result for AT60142 SRAM. GEANT4 as a Monte Carlo code has been used to calculate energy loss and energy straggling of ions with considering metallization and oxide layers. Comparisons between Monte Carlo and experimental results shows that RPP model estimates the SEU cross section with a large deviation in whole LET range, tetrahedral has good response in low LET's but don't follow experimental result for high LET particles and nested sensitive volume produce acceptable results for whole of LET range.

Keywords

[1] Jahinuzzaman, S. M., Modeling and Mitigation of Soft Errors in Nanoscale SRA Ms. (Ph. D. Thesis) University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2008, pp.28-89.
[2] Peterson, E. L., “Geometrical Factors on SEE Rate Calculations,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 44, No. 6, 1993, pp.1888-1909.
[3] Duzellier, S. and Inguimbert, C., “SEU Rate Calculation with GEANT4 (Comparison with CREME 86)”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 51, No. 5, 2004, pp.2805-2810.
[4] Connell, L.W., Sexton, F.W. and Prinja, A. K., “Further Development of the Heavy Ion Cross Section for Single Event Upset”, Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1997 .
[5] Dodd, P. E, Shaney felt, M. R and Sexton, F. W., Charge Collection and SEU from Angled Ion Strikes, Report of Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, Mexico, 1997.
[6] Keating, A. and Oliveira, B., Mars Radiation Environment and Effects on EEE Components, (Ph.D. Thesis), Lisbon, 2008, pp.142-202.
[7] Streetman, B. G., Solid State Electronic Device, 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, 1995, pp.51-90.
[8] Jasprit, S., An Introduction to Semiconductor Devices, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, 1994, pp.12-53.
[9] O., Howard, J. and Block, FL., “Distribution of Radial Energy Deposition around the Track of Energetic Charged Particles in Silicon,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 75, No. 5, 1994, pp.2317-2321.
[10] Zoutendyk, J. A., Crescenta, La , Malone, C. J., Method of Measuring Field Funneling and Range Straggling in Semiconductor Charge Collection Junctions, Washingtown Dc, (United States Patent), 1987.
[11] Bertrand, and Renaud, N., Single Event Transients Characterisation of ATC18RHA ASIC Family, (Workshop) Aerospace Marketing Engineer – Processors & Radiation Aspects, 2007.
[12] Barak, J. and Akkerman, A., “Straggling and Extreme Cases in the Energy Deposition by Ions in Sub-Micron Silicon Volumes”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 52, No. 6, 2005, pp. 2175-2181.
[13] Ke-Ying, Zh., Hong-Xia, G., Yin-Hong, L., “First Principles Simulation Technique for Characterizing Single Event Effects”, Journal of Chinese Physics B, 20, No.6, 2011, pp.46-57.
[14] Geant4 Physics Reference Manual, Available, [on line]: http://geant4.web.cern.ch/geant4/, 2011, pp. 201-212