Author

Satellite Systems Research Institute, Iran Space Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Satellite formation flying is one of the most recent research topics in space field owing to various operational projects. The first and the most important step in facing with this concept is studying and modeling of dynamics of the problem. In this paper, the relative dynamics of a satellite formation flying including the leader-follower satellites based on the concept of control for geostationary vehicles, has been examined. As a consequence, an analytical solution for determination of relative position and velocity of the formation in local horizontal coordinate system which is set on leader-follower satellites has been derived. Dynamics modeling of the problem is done based on parameters which are normally used for control of geostationary maneuvers like station keeping. The advantages of utilizing these parameters are non singularity of equations and having physical sensation to these parameters. The analytical solution has been resulted from two supposes: the relative orbit is semi circular and the leader-follower satellites are close to each other in the formation. 

Keywords

  1. Hill, G.W., “Researches in the Lunar Theory,” American Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1878, pp. 5-26.
  2. Clohessy, W.H. and Wiltshire, R.S. “Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous,” Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, 27, No.9, 1960, pp. 653–658.
  3. Tschauner, J. and Hempel, P., “Optimale Beschleunigungs Programme Für Das Rendezvous-Manöver”, Journal of AstronauticaActa, Vol. 10, No.296, 1964, pp. 339-343,
  4. Carter, T. E. and Humi, M., “Fuel-Optimal Rendezvous Near a Point in General Keplerian Orbit,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 10, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1987, pp. 567-573.
  5. Carter, T. E., “New Form for the Optimal Rendezvous Equations Near a Keplerian Orbit,”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1990, pp. 183-186.
  6. Melton, R. G., “Time-Explicit Representation of Relative Motion Between Elliptical Orbits,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 23, No.4, 2000, pp. 604–610.
  7. Inalhan, G. and How, J., Relative Dynamics and Control of Spacecraft Formations in Elliptic Orbits,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 25, No.1, 2002, pp. 48–59.
  8. Gurfil, P., Idan, M. and Kasdin, N.J., “Neural Adaptive Control for Deep-Space Formation Flying,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 26, No.3, 2003, pp. 491–501.
  9. Gurfil, P., “Relative Motion Between Elliptic Orbits: Generalized Boundedness Conditions and Optimal Formation Keeping,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 28, No.4 , 2005, pp. 761–767.
  10. Vallado, D.A., “Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications,” 2nd Edition, Microcosm Press, Segundo, CA, 2002.
  11. Gim, D. and Alfriend, K. “The State Transition Matrix of Relative Motion for the Perturbed Non-Circular Reference Orbit,” Proceedings of the AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Santa Barbara, CA, 2001.
  12. Schaub, H., and Alfriend, K.T., “J2 Invariant Relative Orbits for Spacecraft Formations,”Journal of Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronom, Vol.79, Issue 2, 2001, pp. 77-95.
  13. Scheeres, D. J., Hsiao, f. Y. and Vinh, N., “Stabilizing Motion Relative to an Unstable Orbit: Applications to Spacecraft Formation Flight,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2003, pp. 62–73.
  14. Koon, W.S., Marsden, J.E. andMurray, R.M. “J2 Dynamics and Formation Flight,” Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Montreal, Quebec, 2001.
  15. Schweighart, S.A. andSedwick, R.J., “High-Fidelity Linearized J2 Model for Satellite Formation Flight”, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics,Vol.25, No.6, 2002, pp. 1073–1080.
  16. Ross, I.M. “Linearized Dynamic Equations for Spacecraft Subject to J2 Perturbations,”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2003, pp. 657–659.
  17. Mishne, D., “Formation Control of LEO Satellites Subject to Drag Variation s and J2 Perturbations,”AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, California 5-8, August, 2002.
  18. Alfriend, K.T., Schaub, H. and Gim, D W., “Gravitational Perturbations, Nonlinearity and Circular Orbit Assumption Effects on Formation Flying Control Strategies,” 23rd Annual AAS Guidance and Control Confrence, AAS Paper 00-012, 2000.
  19. Alfriend, K.T. D.W. Gim and S.R. Vadali, “The Characterization of Formation Flying Satellite Relative Motion Orbits”, AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, AAS Paper 02-143, 2002.
  20. Vaddi, S. S., Alfriend, K. T., Vadali, S. R. and Sengupta, P., “Formation Establishment and Reconfiguration Using Impulsive Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2005, pp. 262-268.
  21. Vadali, S. R., Vaddi, S. S. and Alfriend, K. T., “A New Concept for Controlling Formation Flying Satellite Constellations,” AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, AAS Paper 01-218, 2001.
  22. Vadali, S. R., Vaddi, S. S., Naik, K. S. and Alfriend, K. T. “Control of Satellite Formations,” AIAA Paper 2001-4028,
  23. Mattias Soop, E. Handbook of Geostationary Orbits, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.