Authors

1 Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Increasing in dimensions of the satellites and using light movingstructures, causes flexibility and uncertainty in their models. Therefor to control the attitude of the satellites, should use those methods which resist against the plant’s model uncertainty and could reject the disturbance and the measurementnoise. One of these methods is the robust control. But due to the location of the poles in the dynamic equations of the satellite, the design of robust controllers faces some problems. In this paper, using aninternal feedback, the dynamic equations are changed so that the poles are located in a more proper place. And then,considering flexibility affects as uncertainty and also, uncertainty in inertia matrix of the satellite, a H controller, and finally to improve the performance, a µ-controller will be designed for the new equations. But these two controllers will be analyzed and compared for the primary equations and not for the new equations.For comparison, a classical controller is also designed forthe primary system.

Keywords

[1]Hyland, D. C., Junkins, J. L. and Longman, R. W., “Active Control Technology for Large Space Strauctures,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 16, No. 5, 1993, pp.801-821.
[2]Morgul, O., “Control and Stabilization of A Flexible Beam Attached to A Rigid Body,” International Journal of Control, Vol. 51, No. 1, 1990, pp. 11-31,
[3]Noll, R. B., Zvava, J. and Deyst, J. J., Effect of Structural Flexibility on Spacecraft Control Systems, NASA SP-8016, 1969.
[4]Siamak, T., On Attitude Recovery of Spacecraft Using Nonlinear Control, (Thesis PhD), The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University,Canada, 2005.
[5]Hayrani, OZ., Dynamics and Control in Modal-Space of Flexible Spacecraft, (Thesis PhD), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1979.
[6]Li, G. X., Zhou, J. and Zhou, F. Q., “Variable Structure Control for Flexible Spasecraft,” Proceedings of The 25th Chinese Control Conference, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 2006.
[7]Wu, B., Cao, X. and Li, Z., “Multi-Objective Output-Feedback Control for Microsatellite Attitude Control: An LMI Approach,” Acta Astronautica, No. 64, 2009, pp. 1021-1031.
[8]SeetharamaBhat, M., Sreenatha, A. G. and Shrivastava, S. K, “Robust Low Order Dynamic Controller for Flexible Spacecraft,” Control Theory and Applications, IEEE Proceedings D, Vol. 138, No. 5, 1991, pp. 460-468.
[9]Yang, C. D. and Sun, Y. P., “Mixed 􀜪􀬶/􀜪􀮶 State-Feedback Desing for Microsatellite Attitude Control,”Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 10, Issue 9, 2002, pp.951-970
[10]Chae, J. S. and Park, T. W., “Dynamic Modeling and Control of Flexible Space Structures,” KSME International Journal, Vol. 17, No. 12, 2003, pp. 1912-1921,.
[11]Wang, W., Menon, P. P., Bates, D. G. and Bennani, S.,“Robustness Analysis of Attitude and Orbit Control Systems for Flexible Satellites,” Control Theory & Applications, IET, Vol. 4, Issue 12, 2010, pp. 2958-2970.
[12]Sidi, M. J., Spacecraft Dynamics and Control A Practical Engineering Approach, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997.
[13]Kulkarni, J. and Campbell, M., “An Approach to Magnetic Torque Attitude Control of Satellites via H∞ Control for LTV Systems,” 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Bahamas, 2004, pp. 273-277.
[14]Skogestad, S. and Postlethwaite, I., Multivariable Feedback Control Analysis and Design, John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
[15]Zuou, K. and Doyle, J., EssentialsofRobustControl, Tom Robbins, 1998.
[16]Gu, D. W., Petkov, P. Hr. and Konstantinov, M. M., Robust Control Design with Matlab, Springer, 2005.