Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Aerospace Law Group, Aerospace Research Institute, Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Many of the space applications that previously required the use of large, complex and expensive satellites have now been made possible by very small satellites due to the development of technology. The applicable international laws and regulations, which typically govern large satellite operations with sophisticated technology, also govern state's responsibility for regulating and controlling small satellites. However, in recent years, the private sector has increased its commercial use of small satellites without complying with applicable regulations. As a result, the irregular operation of small satellites in space has increased in orbits without states oversight. Therefore, the responsibility of states in the international space community to regulate the operation of small satellites has been challenged. This paper focuses on the responsibility of states and two challenges arise in relation to the responsibility of states in the operation of small satellites; activity of private section and transfer small satellites ownership into orbits. Finally, the author proposes solutions to address these challenges.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Long, G. A., "Small Satellites and Liability Associated With Space Traffic Situational Awareness," Space Traffic Management Conference, 2014, paper 17.
  2. Paul, B. Larson, “Larsen,Small Satellite Legal Issues”, Air L. & Com, vol. 82, Issu 2, 2017, p. 275.
  3. Cheng, B., "Article VI of the 1967 Space Treaty Revisited: 'International Resonsibility','National Activities' and 'The Appropriate State'," Journal of Space Law, 26, no.1, 1998, pp.7-9.
  4. Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law, 6th Edition, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 429-30.
  5. von der Dunk, Frans G., "Legal Aspects of Satellite Communications—A Mini Handbook," Journal of Telecommunication and Broadcasting Law, vol.4 (September 2015), pp. 1–26.
  6. Cheng, B., "Space Objects and their Various Connecting Factors", in G. L. Lafferranderie and D. Crowther (eds.), Outlook on Space Law over the Next 30 Years, 1997,‌ p 205.
  7. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. Status of Agreements Relating to Activities in Outer Space. Available, [online]: URL:http://www.oosa.unvienna.org /oosa/ SpaceLaw/treatystatus/index.html; Internet.
  8. Palkovitz & T. Masson-Zwaan, Orbiting under the Radar: Nano Satellites, International Obligations and National Space Laws, 55 PROC. INT’L INST. SPACE Law. 2012, pp. 566-569.
  9. Lachs, The Law of Outer Space, An Experience in Contempormy Law Making , USA, Kluwer,1972, p. 70.
  10. Paul, B. Larsen and J.A. Heilbock, "UNIDROIT Project on Security Interests: How the Project Affects Space Objects" Air L. & Com. Vol 64 No 2, P 727. 1999
  11. Hong, Make Outer Space Safe for All, China Daily, Beijing, see www.spacewar.com/reports/ Make_ outer_ space_safe _for_all_999. html visited 7August 2011. But see de Selding, Europe Changes Tactics in Push for Space Code of Conduct, Space News, April 29, 2013 at A.
  12. US 2010 Space Policy Statement, at 4. US Assistant Deputy Secretary of Defense Gregory Schulte stated that the United States wants to open dialogue with China to create rules of the road for outer space, see Zakaria, US Wants to Talk Outer Space with China, www.reuters.com/assets/print?aird=USTRE76I6 F320119718, July 20, 2011
  13. Federal Communications Commission. FCC Guidance on Obtaining Licenses for Small Satellites Washington D.C.: GPO, 2013). Available at URL:http://hraunfoss. fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-445-13A1.pdf; Internet.
  14. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. Status of Agreements Relating to Activities in Outer Space. Available at URL:http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/oosa/ SpaceLaw/treatystatus/index.html; Internet.
  15. United States Code, National and Commercial Space Programs, 51 U.S.C. § 509 (2011). 27. United States Department of State. International Traffic in Arms Regulations. Available at URL: http://pmddtc.state.gov/ regulations_laws/itar.html; Internet.
  16. Dillow, C. Here’s Why Small Satellites Are so Big Right Now, FORTUNE (Aug.4, 2015), http://fortune.com/ 2015/08/04/small-satellites-newspace/[https://perma.cc/ 87KV-7WRQ].
  17. Frans von der Dunk, “Fundamental provisions for national space laws”, United Nations/Nigeria Workshop on Space Law” Meeting international responsibilities and addressing domestic needs" Nigeria, Abuja, 21-24 November 2005 in: http://www.unoosa.org/pdf/sap/2005 /nigeria/presentations/02-06_2.pdf (last visited Jan. 01, 2010).
  18. William B. Wirin, "Practical Implications of Launching State Appropriate State Definitions," 37 Proceedings of Space Law Conference, 1994, p. 109-113
  19. Cheng, B., "Article VIof the 1967 Space Treaty Revisited: 'International Resonsibility','National Activities' and 'The Appropriate State'" 26, no. 1 Journal of Space Law,7 1998,p. 9.
  20. Webber, A.D., "Launching the Rocket Industry in the United States: Domestic Regulation of Private Expandable Launch Vehicles", Journal of Air Law and Commerce, vol. 49, no.1, 1984, p. 39.
  21. http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/SORegister/regist.htm
  22. Remarks, A., on The Notion of Launching State, Kerrest 1999, 41 Proceedings of Space Law Conference, p 309.
  23. Frankle, E.A. & E.G. Stepote, Legal Considerations Affecting Commercial Space Launches from International Territory, 1999, 50 Proceedings of Space Law Conference, p 10.