نویسندگان

چکیده

This paper focuses upon the development of an efficient method for conceptual design optimization of a satellite. There are many option for a satellite subsystems that could be choice, as acceptable solution to implement of a space system mission. Every option should be assessment based on the different criteria such as cost, mass, reliability and technology contraint (complexity). In this research, mass and technology constraints, which have a direct impact on the satellite life cycle cost, are considerd as system level objective function to obtain the system optimal solution during the coceptual design phase. The approach adopted in this paper is based on a distributed collaborative optimization (CO) framework. At system level, multiobjective optimization goal is to minimize the dry mass of the satellite and, simultaneously, minimize the system technology complexity which is subject to equality constraints. The use of equality constraints at the system level in CO to represent the disciplinary feasible regions, introduces numerical and computational difficulties as the discipline level optima are non-smooth and noisy functions of the system level optimization parameters.To address these difficulties robust optimization algorithms such as genetic algorithms (GA) are used at the system level. The results show that the CO framework has the same level of accuracy as the conventional All-At-Once approaches.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Satellite Conceptual Design Multi-Objective Optimization Using Co Framework

نویسندگان [English]

  • A. Jafarsalehi
  • M. Mirshams
  • R. Emami

چکیده [English]

This paper focuses upon the development of an efficient method for conceptual design optimization of a satellite. There are many option for a satellite subsystems that could be choice, as acceptable solution to implement of a space system mission. Every option should be assessment based on the different criteria such as cost, mass, reliability and technology contraint (complexity). In this research, mass and technology constraints, which have a direct impact on the satellite life cycle cost, are considerd as system level objective function to obtain the system optimal solution during the coceptual design phase. The approach adopted in this paper is based on a distributed collaborative optimization (CO) framework. At system level, multiobjective optimization goal is to minimize the dry mass of the satellite and, simultaneously, minimize the system technology complexity which is subject to equality constraints. The use of equality constraints at the system level in CO to represent the disciplinary feasible regions, introduces numerical and computational difficulties as the discipline level optima are non-smooth and noisy functions of the system level optimization parameters.To address these difficulties robust optimization algorithms such as genetic algorithms (GA) are used at the system level. The results show that the CO framework has the same level of accuracy as the conventional All-At-Once approaches.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Design optimization
  • multiobjective
  • collaborative optimization
  • satellite conceptual design
  • Genetic Algorithms
[1] Huang, H. and Wang, D., “A Framework of Multiobjective Collaborative Optimization, Springer Science and Business Media B.V., 2009.
[2]Kodiyalam, S. and Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., “Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: Some Formal Methods, Framework Requirements, and Application to Vehicle Design,” International Journal Vehicle Design (Special Issue), Vol. 25, No. 1, 2001, pp. 3-32
[3]Cramer, E.J., Frank, P.D., Shubin G.R., Dennis, J.E. and  Lewis, R.M., “On Alternative Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization,ˮ 4th AIAA/USAF/NASA/OAI Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Cleveland, OH, AIAA, No. 4752, 1992.
[4]Kroo, I., “Decomposition and Collaborative Optimization for Large Scale Aerospace Design,” ICAS/Larc / SIAM Workshop on Multidisciplinary Optimization, Hampton, VA, 1995.
[5]Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., Agte, J. and Sandusky Jr, R., “Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS),” Proceedings 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, Mo, AIAA, No. 4916, 1998.
[6]Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., “Optimization by Decomposition: A Step From Hierarchic to Non-Hierarchic Systems,ˮ Second NASA / Air Force Symposium on Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Hampton, VA, NASA – CP, No. 3031, 1988.
[7] Kim, H.M., Rideout, D.G., Papalambros, P.Y., Stein, J.L., “Analytical Target Cascading in Automotive Vehicle Design,ˮ Journal Mechanical Design, Vol. 125, Issue 3, 2003, pp. 481-489.
[8]Wang, Z.G., Chen, X.Q. and Luo, W.C., “Research on The Theory and Application of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization,ˮ Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2006. 
[9]Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. and Haftka, R.T., Multidisciplinary Aerospace Design Optimization: Survey of Recent Developments, Structural Optimization 14, Springer-Verlag, 1997.
[10]Barnhart, D.J., Vladimirova, T. and  Sweetin, M. N., “Small Satellite Design for Distributed Space Mission,ˮ Journal of  Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 44, No. 6, 2007.
[11]AIAA White Paper: “Current State Of The Art On Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO),ˮ An Integrated Evaluation System For The Conceptual Design Of Space Systems, AIAA, Washington, D.C., 1991.
[12]Santhana Krishnan, D. Parks, G. T. Jarrett, J. P. and John Clarkson, P., “An Integrated Evaluation System for The Conceptual Design of Space Systems,ˮ 7th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER), Lough Borough University , 2009.
[13]Chang-Chun Chen, Zhao-Wei Sun, Wei-Chao Zhong, “The Satellite Optimization Design Using Collaborative Optimization Method Based on Normal Cloud Model,ˮ International Conference on Electronic & Mechanical Engineering And Information Technology, 2011.
[14]Byoungsoo, K., Conceptual Space Systems Design Using Meta-Heuristic Algorithms, (Ph.D. Thesis), University of Colorado, 2002
[15]Hassan, R.A., “Genetic Algorithm Approaches for Conceptual Design of Spacecraft Systems Including Multi-Objective Optimization and Design Under Uncertainty,” (Ph.D. Thesis), Purdue University, 2004.
[16]Loh, K., Khatri, A., Thunnissen, D., and Au, S.K., “Conceptual Design Of The Ship Tracking And Environmental Protection Satellite (STEPS),ˮ Proceeding of The 2007 Asia Space Conference, Paper 116, March 2007.
[17]Magnin, M., “Multi-Objective Optimization under Uncertainty of Satellite System Via Simulated Annealingˮ 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, 2008.
[18]Jafarsalehi, A., MohammadZadeh, P. and Mirshams, M., “Collaborative Optimization of Remote Sensing Small Satellite Mission Using Genetic Algorithms,ˮ IJST, Transaction of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 36, No. M2, 2012, pp. 117-128.
[19]Xiaolu, L., Yingguo, ch., Yingwu, ch. and Renjie H.E., “Optimization of Earth Observation Satellite System Based on Parallel Systems and Computational Experiments,ˮ Journal of Control Theory and Application, Vol.11, No.2, 2013, pp. 200–206 .
[20]Broun, R. D. Moore, A. A, Kroo, I. M., “Collaborative Architecture for Launch Vehicle Design,ˮ Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 39, No. 4, 1997, pp. 478-486.
[21]Sobieski, I. P., Kroo. I. M., “Collaborative Optimization Applied to an Aircraft  Design Problem,ˮ The  34th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and  Exhibit, Reno, Nevada  AIAA, Paper 96, 1996, p.715.
[22]Mcalister, C., D., Simpson, T.W., Kurtz, P.H. and Yukish M., “Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Test Based on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Design,ˮ The 9th AIAA/ISSOM Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and  Optimization Atlanta, Georgia, 2002.
[23]Hwang, L., Lee, Bo-Ra Su-Jeoung Kim, “Development of System Engineering Design Tool for Small Satellite Conceptual Design,ˮ Journal of KSAS, Vol. 32, No. 9, 2004, pp. 93-103.
[24]Wertz, J.R. and Larson, Space Mission Analysis and Design, 3rd Edition Microcosm, Torrance, California, USA,1999.
[25]Ravachol, M., “Multilevel Multidisciplinary Optimization of Aircraft,ˮ European- U.S. MDO Colloquium Proceedings, German Aerospace Center, Goettingen, Germany, 2006.
[26]Agte, J.De Weck, O. Jaroslaw S.-Sobieski, Arendsen, P., Morris, A. and Spieck, M., “MDO: Assessment and Direction for Advancement an Opinion of One International Group,ˮ 2010.
[27]Akhlaghi, A. M., Naseh, H., Mirshams, M. and Irani, S., “Reliability Allocation to Launch Vehicle Subsystems By Using AHP Method in Conceptual Design Phase,ˮ Journal of Space Science and Technology (JSST), Vol. 5, No. 2, 2012,  (In Persian).
[28]Zadeh, PM., Toropov, V.V. and Wood, A., “ Metamodel – Based Collaborative Optimization,ˮ Journal of Structures and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2008, pp. 103-115.