Authors

1 M. Sc. Department of Aerospace University Complex, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, IRAN

2 Assistant Professor, Satellite and amp; LV center, Department, of Aerospace Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, IRAN

Abstract

Basically, it takes alot of time to analyze structures with different parameters, depending on the type of structure and parameters. Also, by changing any parameter, all the analysis process must be repeated. Therefore analyze the effect of different parameters on the behavior of structures, many analyzes should be carried out that are time consuming. The results obtained are valid only for the same parameters, and are not valid by changing the parameters. In this research, a Nested dependence method has been developed that can be used to determine the behavior of the structure with proper accuracy with short time. In this method, first an interval is considered for different parameters of the structure. Then, by using the finite element analysis method and applying the loading and boundary conditions, the behavior of the structure. By repeating this process to extract the appropriate number of input data, a Nested dependence method can be used to estimate the structure behavior of different inputs.

Keywords

[1]Stevens, L., Design analysis fabrication and testing of a nanosatellite structure, MSc Thesis, The Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002.
[2] Wallin, M., Ivarsson, N. and Tortorellib, D., “Stiffness Optimization of Non-linear Elastic Structures, Computer,” Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 330, 2018, pp. 292-307.
[3] Degertekin, S.O., Lamberti, L. and Ugur, I.B., “Sizing Layout and Topology Design Optimization of Truss Structures Using The Jaya Algorithm,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 70, 2017, pp. 903-928.
[4] Yixian, D., Hanzhao, L., Zhen, L. and Qihua, T. “Topological Design Optimization of Lattice Structures to Maximize Shear Stiffness,” Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 112, 2017, pp. 211-221.
[5] Assimi, H., Jamali, A. and Narimanzadeh, N., “Sizing and Topology Optimization of Truss Structures Using Genetic Programming,” Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 37, 2017, pp. 90-103.
[6] Khatibinia, M. and Yazdani, H., “Accelerated Multi- Gravitational Search Algorithmfor Size Optimization of Truss Structures,” Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 38, 2018, pp. 109-119.
[7] Nosratolahi, M., Hoseini, M. and Adami, A., “Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Controllable Reentry Capsule for minimum Landing Velocity,” 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 18th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 12th, 2010.
[8] Nosratollahi, M., Mortazavi, M., Adami, A. and Hosseini, M., “Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Reentry Vehicle Using Genetic Algorithm,” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, Vol. 82, No. 3, 2010, pp. 194-203.
[9] Mirjalili, S. and Lewis, A., “The Whale Optimization Algorithm,” Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 95, 2016, pp. 51-67.
[10]Mirjalili, S., “Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm,” Knowledgebased Systems, Volume 89, 2015, pp. 229-249.
[11]Advanced Reentry Demonstrator, Accessed on 9 January 2018; Available: [on line], http://www.nelsonair.com.
[12]Atmospheric Reentry Demonstrator, Accessed on 9 January 2018; Available: [on line], http://www.esa.int /About_Us/ESA_Publications.
[13]Advanced Reentry Demonstrator, Accessed on 9 January, Available: [on line], 2018; http://space. skyrocket. de /doc_sdat/ard.htm. 
[14]Fujimoto, K. and Fujii, K., “Computational Aerodynamic Analysis of Capsule Configurations Toward the Development of Reusable Rockets,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2018, pp. 77-83.