Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Aerospace University Complex, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran. Iran

2 Department of Aerospace University Complex, Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran Iran

3 Department of Aerospace Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In this paper, a novel Comprehensive Preference-based Design (CPD) approach is presented which attempts to achieve subjective attributes that are defined in the concept of maximization of designer/customer's satisfaction in addition to objective goals which are formulated in the form of minimization of a performance criterion in a two-phase structure using two nested optimizers.In the first phase of CPD,using the concept of satisfaction,the subjective preferences of the designer/customer are defined in terms of fuzzy relationships and operators.Whereas the results of this phase are inaccurate,in the second phase,it is attempted to define a performance criterion and in order to achieve an optimal operational plan,attitude parameters and the compromises needed to meet the designer/customer's preferences are implemented.The methodology is utilized to design of a space launch vehicle for delivering 1200 kg payload to a 750 km orbit.Comparison of the results shows that despite the higher mass of launch vehicle designed by CPD,overall design satisfaction is higher and designer/customer's preferences have been satisfied.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Cogan, Systems Engineering - Practice and Theory, Croatia: InTech Publication, 2012.
  2. Roshanian, M. Ebrahimi, "Latin hypercube sampling applied to reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization of a launch vehicle", Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp.297-304, 2013.
  3. M. Mirshams, H. Karimi, H. Naseh, "Multi-Stage Liquid Propellant Launch Vehicle Conceptual Design (LVCD) Software, Based on Multi-Parameter Optimization Idea", Journal of Space Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2008. (In Persian)
  4. Ullah, D.Q. Zhou, P. Zhou, M. Hussain and M. Amjad Sohail. "An approach for space launch vehicle conceptual design and multi-attribute evaluation." Aerospace science and technology, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 65-74, 2013.
  5. Roshanian, M. Ebrahimi, E. Taheri, A. A. Bataleblu, "Multidisciplinary design optimization of space transportation control system using genetic algorithm", Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 228, No. 4, pp. 518-529, 2014.
  6. R. Martins, A. B. Lambe, "Multidisciplinary design optimization: a survey of architectures", AIAA journal, Vol. 51, No. 9, pp. 2049-2075, 2013.
  7. Dupont, A. Tromba, S. Missonnier, "Multidisciplinary system optimisation on the design of cost effective space launch vehicle." World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 2017, 2017.
  8. Mirshams, J. Roshanian, S. Yadegari D., A. A. Bataleblu,  "Launch vehicle collaborative robust optimal design with multiobjective aspect and uncertainties," Modares Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 11, pp. 339-350, 2016. (In Persian)
  9. M. Hashemi D., H. Darabi, J. Roshanian, "Comparison between traditional method (statistical method) and multidisciplinary optimization method (aao) in designing of a lightweight liquid propellant LV", Journal of Space Science and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2012.
  10. F. Brown, J. R. Olds, "Evaluation of multidisciplinary optimization techniques applied to a reusable launch vehicle," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1289-1300, 2006.
  11. Chhabra, M. R. Emami, "Aholistic approach to concurrent engineering and its application to robotics", Concurrent Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 48-61, 2014.
  12. Chhabra, M. R. Emami, "A holistic concurrent design approach to robotics using hardware-in-the-loop simulation", Mechatronics, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 335-345, 2013.
  13. M. R. Emami, I. B. Türksen, A. A. Goldenberg, "A unified parameterized formulation of reasoning in fuzzy modeling and control", Fuzzy sets and systems, Vol. 108, No. 1, pp. 59-81, 1999.